WAKE UP!
He's only playing the "Gender" card to try to win over Hillary supporters. Remember though, PALIN IS NOT HILLARY! She can't even hold a candle to Hillary! Her 1.5 years as Governor of Alaska compared to Hillary's 35 years of fighting for you? Please! If you vote for McCain because of Palin, you're SPITTING on Hillary and all that she has worked so hard for! Think hard about that before you vote for 4 more years of Republican rule.
Now, I can wholeheartedly understand women's frustrations with Hillary being passed over as VP, but *THIS* should be taken as an insult to their intelligence and will be seen for exactly what it is, nothing more than blatant pandering.
Hillary would have made a good President, HOWEVER, her ideals and policies are very similar to Obama's. Elect Obama, and we will see some, if not most of the things Hillary was fighting for. Elect McCain, and we will see little (if any) of Hillary's vision. If you give a damn about the direction of this country, you will consider who HILLARY would want you to vote for. As she said in her speech at the DNC:
"I haven't spent the past 35 years in the trenches advocating for children, campaigning for universal health care, helping parents balance work and family and fighting for women's rights here at home and around the world, to see another Republican in the White House squander our promise of a country that really fulfills the hopes of our people.
And YOU haven't worked so hard over the last 18 months, or endured the last 8 years to suffer through more failed leadership!
No Way... No How... No McCain!
Barack Obama is my candidate and he MUST be our President!"
~Sen. Hillary Clinton
__________
The facts about Sarah Palin?
1) Degree in journalism
2) Former sportscaster in Alaska
3) City council member in town of little over 5,000 people
4) Governor of Alaska for 1.5 years
5) Extreme Right Politics
6) Former runner up as Miss Alaska (Beauty Contest)
Geschäftszeichen: 6111 Js 228014/08
Bearbeiter: OSta Claude
20. Juli 2008
Dear Senior State Attorney, Herrn Claude
I thank you most kindly for your considered and edifying reply, following that of State Attorney Frau Niesen, in regard to a polite theological question I asked the ZJD (Central Council of Jews in Germany) some months ago, and for this I am most appreciative.
However, I still take umbrage at the ZJD's claim that my question was motivated by "Volksverhetzung" -- "Incitement of the masses (ostensibly against other races or ethnic groups)" -- and I ask myself why they have not apologized to me.
I know that you are sufficiently conversant with these matters, but I still feel impelled to set the record straight. I simply posited an enquiry regarding biblical interpretation and mentioned a number of genealogical facts that are permissible to utter, even in Germany. The well-known truism that the six million number is based on a Kabbalistic numerological interpretation of Leviticus, Chapter 25, Verse 10 was confirmed and established by learned Rabbis throughout the centuries, including Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon (Maimonides) and, most recently, by the religious Israel historian and Haaretz journalist Tom Segev.
"And thou shalt sanctify the fiftieth year, and shalt proclaim remission to all the inhabitants of thy land: for it is the year of jubilee. Every man shall return to his possession, and every one shall go back to his former family." -- Lev. 25:10
The Hebrew version:
http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0325.htm
Please note that the Hebrew rendition is not accurately transcribed in European translations, nor is it is published as such in the form given in the Torah of the laity and would rarely be written as such even in the Priestly Torah. Other renditions can be found in various versions of the Remez and the Sod, both works of which deal with hidden and esoteric meanings. However, notice the markings above and below each letter.
To the casual reader who does not understand Hebrew beyond its fundamentals, or the way in which reversals and simple annotations by Rabbis on just one single letter can change the entire structure and meaning of a sentence, this verse in the Remez or Sod makes very little sense. However, the symbolic calibration of this line in many Kabbalistic versions of the Torah written in Hebrew does in fact change the entire sense of the sentence to one that states: "The return to the land will not occur until the Lord has been offered a holocaust [burnt offering] of six million". (The wording differs in some versions of the Remez and Sod, although not in the Midrash.) It is, of course a contrivance by deft of hand.
Every Jew who has had an intensive education in the Torah, Talmud, and Kabbalah knows this. My Jewish friends at school knew this. My religious teacher knew this (and, by the way, I was top of my class in Religious Instruction). However, neither Frau Knobloch nor Herr Kramer of the ZJD seem to be in any way aware of this well-known theological fact, which concerns me deeply because, being Jews, they should be in a position to know. Why didn't they simply write to me and say, "Sorry, Mike. We just have no idea. Why not teach us?"
When I humbly ask someone a straightforward question, I do not expect him or her to call out the National Guard and convene a meeting of the United Nations Security Council. I simply expect a reply. That is the English way; and contempt for my English education, English cultural mores, English skeptical empiricism, and English sense of fair play is something that can be construed as a form of racism. Perhaps Frau Knobloch and Herr Kramer bear some kind of animosity toward English people. What other reason could there be?
To have originally accused me of the same (incitement toward hatred of a particular race or ethnic group) appears to be premised on their belief that I despise every member of their race, the Kazaks.
Not only is this not true on the face of it -- I have friends from all ethnic and racial commonalities -- it is intellectually impossible to hate an entire race or ethnic group. The concept of "group hatred" does not exist in traditional western jurisprudence, which has always sought remedies for violation of personal rights by treating plaintiffs and defendants as individuals. In most pre-EU nations (and still today in the United States) this was the basis of tort (civil) and non-tort (private) law. (I was also second in my class in Law, by the way).
The reason for this was, sensibly, quite simple. It is philosophically and psychologically impossible for a human being to hate an entire kindred. One may be given to articulate such sentiments, whether jokingly, in a moment of peer-group camaraderie, or as a generalization intended to make a simple point, but the human psyche is so neurologically configured that it can only hold feelings of detestation against an individual, and, even here, not against the individual as a whole, but only an aspect or a trait of that individual's personality. This was ably demonstrated by the psychologist Wilhelm Reich, famous for his prize-winning study "The Mass Psychology of Fascism". No modern psychologist would ever testify that it is within the scope of the human psyche to bear unremittingly the emotional burden of hatred for an entire race.
It is quite common these days to hear people say, "I hate Turks," yet most, if not all, of them have Turkish friends and dine with them in Turkish cafes. I, for instance, dislike fruit, vegetables, and grains because I have a digestive intolerance to cellulose, lactose, and gluten, but I love strawberries, which I can eat on occasion. Therefore, it cannot really be said that I 'hate' all fruit, and I am certainly not given to verbally insulting apples and oranges or physically abusing cartons of milk whenever I visit the supermarket.
The concept of Volksverhetzung was introduced into Soviet law by Lenin in the early stages of the Bolshevik-Zionist revolution owing to widespread resentment among the Russian people of the large number of Zionist-Jews who ran the Politburo and headed the dreaded secret police, the Cheka. It is therefore born of a communist mindset and is completely alien to the idea of a modern "Rechtsstaat" (a state governed by the Rule of Law). I was also the top of my class in history, incidentally.
Laws against 'incitement and group or race hatred' are therefore laws premised on the Bolshevik organization of the state on the basis of a hive mentality and have no place in a modern, liberal democracy, or even our current "Scheindemokratie" (illusory democracy).
These laws, as you know, were designed to reinforce a particular narrative which requires the support of statutes (statutorily enforced history), which must be seen in the perspective of solicitation to perjury for those born after these events were reported to have taken place.
-----
No policeman would ever ask someone born in 1959 to stand in the dock before a judge and swear on the Bible that he had witnessed a crime that allegedly took place twenty years before he was born. Such a policemen would surely find himself charged with corruption and the witness would be incarcerated for perjury.
-----
Indeed, anyone who forces another person to affirm an alleged crime he has not personally witnessed is guilty of incitement to bear false witness, which is a felonious violation of both German law, the law of Moses, and the Law of God Almighty, Jesus Christ. (Aufwiegelung zur Meineid, Aufwiegelung zur Gotteslästerung.)
One of my earliest memories was as a child watching the ceremonial funeral of the war criminal Winston Churchill on black and white television. I'm almost sure I can say that he did indeed live and die, but I cannot prove it, for I never met the man, nor did I attend his last rites at his bedside. In my mind he is simply a story, a picture book narrative of a man who played (or may have played) a role in the affairs of the world. I'm inclined to believe that Churchill existed because the laws of cause and effect indicate that he is one of the many dots that connect us to our present time.
I was born on 20 December 1959, but probably only became intellectually aware of the world around me in a way I could commit to memory and analytical comprehension at some point between 1961 and 1962. Therefore, everything that "happened" in the world before 1962 is not true for me. It didn't "happen". It represents nothing more than second-hand or third-party information transmitted by other people whom I am told to "trust" or by the electronic media, history books and newspapers fashioned by those who may sometimes try to be objective, but either make mistakes or are subject to controllers whose aim is to propagate a slanted version of reported "events".
However, I can prove that I was the 1973 and 1974 champion in the 800 and 1600-metre inter-school South Fylde Olympics, because I was a witness to my own victory, have personal experiential memories of the event and the gold medals to prove it. It may not be true for you and you don't have to believe me (I won't sue you or send you to prison), but I was there, crossed the line and wrote an additional line in my own personal history book.
Ever since the dawn of Sumerian civilization, history books have been re-written countless times to include new information or exclude details that were proven false and based on fantastically colorful myths. My Grammar School history teacher was an honorary professor of Oxford University who taught me that, in contrast to mathematics, history is a 'moveable feast', meaning that it is always subject to review depending upon the emergence of new data that comes to light. History is a work in progress, and it is a book that will remain eternally under the editor's lamp.
We now know that Christopher Columbus was not the first European to set foot on North American soil. We know that William Wallace never personally met Robert the Bruce. We now know, by the CIA's own recent admission, that the 'Bay of Tonkin' incident never happened. We now know that Marie Antoinette was falsely attributed by Rousseau to have said, "Let them eat cake." She never said it.
We now know that Sir Walter Raleigh did not introduce potatoes to England (they originated in Italy). We now know that Nero did not play the fiddle as Rome burned, for the fiddle was invented 1,600 years later. We now know that the Dutchman Abel Tasman discovered Australia, not Captain Cook. We now know that America gained her independence on 3 September 1783, not on 4 July 1776. We now know that Peyton Randolph was the first president of the United States, not George Washington. We now know that the ancient Gaels of Ireland developed Sanskrit and a prototype of the Hebrew language.
We now know, thanks to DNA scientists, that the Palestinians were the original Children of Israel and never left the Land of their Fathers. We now know that, for all but a minority of the Palestinian Sephardim, the "Diaspora" is largely a myth created by a people who originated north of Kazakhstan, converted to Judaism centuries later, and then migrated to Eastern Europe.
We now know that the world is not flat.
Why do we now know all these things? Because men and women asked questions. Incredible, isn't it?
In England, children are taught: Believe nothing you hear, only half of what you read and question everything. This is life-saving, good old fashioned British advice, and I observe it daily. It is an integral part of my cultural upbringing and is as essential to my being as the very heart that pumps blood through my veins.
To recapitulate: No matter what "happened" before the development of my intellectual facilities in 1962, it didn't happen. The "world" for me did not exist before 20 December 1959, and it did not become "real" to me until some point in 1962. From my perspective, all events prior to 1962 do not constitute history, simply stories told to me by strangers with unknown motives. Novels and poetry. A fantasy matrix of moving pictures and scripted political drama. The Twilight Zone of a world in which video killed the radio star. Bubbles in my bathtub.
In a society where intellectual and historical enquiry is punishable by law, it cannot be said that we are living in either a democracy or a Rechtsstaat. It is a selective oligarchy that ring-fences individuals into preferential and non-preferential groups by means of social engineering and is therefore, as was the case with the USSR and other Bolshevik regimes, a dysfunctional administrative entity that will eventually implode under the pressure of its own internal contradictions.
As you are aware:
-----
"It remains the case that the German Reich [established in 1871] survived the collapse of 1945 and did not cease to exist, neither through capitulation nor the exercise of foreign power in Germany on the part of the allies; it possesses today, as it always has, legal and judicial sovereignty. The BRD (Federal Republic of Germany) is not the legal successor of the German Reich."
- Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court), 31 July 1973 (Urteile 2 Bvl.6/56; 2 BvF 1/73; 2 BvR 373/83; BVGE 2,266 (277); 3, 288 (319ff; 5.85) 126; 6, 309, 336 und 363).
-----
I understand that jurists are under enormous pressure to square this impossible circle so that it does not become known that the European Union, by virtue of every treaty signed by the unconstitutional BRD, is an illegal political construct. When the people of Germany, Britain, Ireland, Austria, Poland, Italy, France and all other members of the European Soviet of Zionist States became fully conversant with the truth, there will follow a period of upheaval in Europe and a return to natural nation-state democracy. I guarantee it. Because I'm the messenger.
THE MOSSAD IS ISRAEL’S intelligence agency with headquarters in Tel Aviv.
According to the official Web Site, the Mossad carries out many operations including:
Covert intelligence gathering beyond Israel’s borders.
Carrying out special operations beyond Israel’s borders.
Developing special diplomatic and covert relations abroad.
Preventing the development of non-conventional weapons by hostile countries.
As regards carrying out special operations beyond Israel’s borders, the recent Georgian conflict has brought to light Mossad’s role in training Georgian commandos.
FALSE FLAGS & ASSASSINATIONS:
OPERATION SUSANNA WAS a false flag operation conducted in 1954 by Mossad operatives in Egypt against American and British targets.
The operation, known as The Lavon Affair, was designed to appear as though Egyptian Arabs had carried out attacks on US Information Agency libraries in Alexandria and Cairo and British-owned theaters in Cairo on July 14, 1954. Mossad agents had infiltrated Egyptian society and recruited Egyptian-born Jews to carry out the operation.
At first, believing that radical Egyptians were to blame, Egyptian authorities finally uncovered the Mossad operation. Two Mossad agents were hanged and several others were sentenced to lengthy prison terms. Two other operatives committed suicide.
Since the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, over 530 Iraqi scientists have been assassinated by Mossad agents operating in Iraq. These scientists were considered a threat to Israel as they had the expertise to develop both biological and nuclear weapons.
According to a Palestine Information Center Report, the US Pentagon cooperated with the Mossad deciding that the best way to get rid of the scientists was to “physically eliminate them.” The Brussels Tribunal has provided a list of the Iraqi scientists that have been murdered by the Mossad.
Is It Not Time That The Wicked State Of Israel Be Censured As The Enemy Of Humanity? Absolutely!
Mukassey, Chertoff, and Russian Israeli Mafia
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_3479.shtml
The same cancer that bankrupted the Soviet Union and the early Russian Federation, namely the Russian-Israeli Mafia -- the global organized crime syndicate that uses Israeli government protection and passports to cover their illegal worldwide activities -- has so thoroughly permeated the American political and business system that the FBI and U.S. intelligence agencies are virtually powerless to bring the major perpetrators to justice.
CONTROLLED PRESS HIDES CHERTOFF'S ISRAELI ROOTS *PIC*
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframesread=66175
Michael Chertoff, the new head of the Department of Homeland Security, was approved in a 98-0 vote in the U.S. Senate without the question of his Israeli roots and nationality even being raised. On February 15, 2005, Michael Chertoff, an apparent dual national with Israeli roots, was sworn in as the second Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The new "homeland security czar," who oversees the U.S. Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, seems to be hiding his own dual-national status with the cooperation of the controlled press.
Why have Soviet secret service 'KGB', General Yevgeni Primakov, as well as Markus Wolfe, the ex-boss of the ''STASI'', the equally feared former East German 'State Security Police' been hired by - and for - the US Gov't.?
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/12/302870.html
PEOPLE NOT UNDERSTANDING NOR SEEING THIS ''MENE TEKEL'' ARE BRAINWASHED BLIND... US: KGB and STASI reinforce Homeland Security. For whom? "These appointments have already been made"!
Michael Chertoff and the sabotage of the Ptech investigation
http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/01/michael-chertoff-and-sabotage-of-ptech.html
Remember Ptech? That's the Boston software firm financed by Saudi businessman Yassin Al-Qadi, who also happens to be an al Qaeda bagman, whose clients happened to include numerous sensitive US federal branches and agencies, including the FAA, the FBI, the military, and the White House.
In our previous essay "The Significance Of Revisionism" we examined the basic proof of the revisionist case that "The Holocaust" was a hoax, as well as the greater implications of the legend. In this essay, we shall consider a wider variety of factors which are inconsistent with the legend. The purpose is not to pile proof upon proof but to demonstrate that all relevant factors which bear upon the story are consistent with the revisionist interpretation, not with the extermination story.
(1) No one knew of any extermination during the war.
Never in the history of the world has any mass extermination taken place while the world remained ignorant of it. The massacres of the communists in Russia, the murders of Mao Tse-tung, the slaughters of the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, the death camps of the British in South Africa, the starvation of the Irish, all were known as they were taking place. Only during "The Holocaust", we are told, was a super secret extermination taking place. This is suspicious on the face of it. How could such a massive undertaking be planned, coordinated, and carried out on a continental scale without anyone knowing about it until after the war?
(2) German records are consistent that German policy was one of deportation and expulsion, not extermination.
Claims that Adolf Hitler issued "oral orders" for the extermination of the Jews are a concoction to cover up what the German records do say. German policy was originally to deport the Jews to Madagascar, Palestine or wherever the Germans could dump them. After the invasion of Russia German policy was to deport the Jews to the territories of the occupied east. There is no surviving documentary evidence to show that German policy was ever anything else. Hitler's Minister of the Interior, Hans Lammerer, recorded in a note of a phone conversation with the Fuehrer that "Hitler wanted the solution of the Jewish problem delayed until after the end of the war." No one has yet explained how that remark can be reconciled with his alleged intent to exterminate them.
(3) Allied intelligence knew nothing of any attempt to exterminate the Jews.
Allied intelligence was fully aware of what was taking place within Auschwitz, the alleged main killing center. American planes took many Aerial reconnaissance photographs of Auschwitz. Those photos show no evidence of mass executions. They do show an enormous industrial/war production center surrounded by Polish farmland. There was nothing secret or isolated about the camp complex. Claims of Jewish extermination were dismissed by American and British officials as Jewish propaganda of the World War One variety.
(4) Underground intelligence groups operating out of the camps knew nothing of any extermination program.
The Polish and Ukrainian undergrounds ran intelligence couriers out of the Auschwitz camps and communicated regularly with their governments-in-exile by radio broadcast. Not once did they mention any extermination program. Nor did Polish laborers employed by the Germans at Auschwitz say anything about any extermination program. How can an actual extermination program be concealed from the eyes of the other inmates at the alleged killing center?
(5) The Vatican knew nothing of a Jewish extermination program during the war.
Auschwitz was located in Poland, a Catholic country. The Vatican was exceedingly well informed about what was going on in Poland. Yet the Vatican was silent about a supposed extermination program of which they would have been the first to know, if it had actually been taking place.
(6) Many aspects of the extermination story have been abandoned since the war. How believable are the remaining parts of the extermination claims?
It is now conceded by the Jews themselves that the camps in Germany, Austria, and Czechoslovakia were not extermination camps. The casualties at Dachau, Buchenwald, Gross-Raven, Theresienstadt, Mathausen, and others were caused by disease and overcrowding at the end of the war. Why, then, are the claims of extermination at Auschwitz and the other camps any more believable? Claims of murder of Jews by steaming, mass electrocutions and other absurd methods, as introduced as evidence at Nuremberg, have also been dropped. The human soap story and human lampshade stories have also been dropped as fiction.
(7) If the Germans were in fact exterminating the Jews en masse, why did the SS establish a special investigating commission to uncover abuses of prisoners by German camp personnel?
Judge Konrad Morgen of the SS was authorized to investigate corruption and abuse of prisoners in the labor camp system. He prosecuted many such cases before the end of the war, including the infamous Ilse Koch and her husband. It strains credulity to believe that a German regime which was exterminating Jewish prisoners by the millions in "gas chambers" would simultaneously protect their "rights" by prosecuting camp personnel who abused them. There also exist detailed camp regulations on proper procedures for punishing prisoners. No regime conducting an actual extermination program would bother with such formalities.
(8) The communist governments in Eastern Europe after the war were all heavily dominated by Jewish commissars.
Unless the "gassed" Jews rose from the dead after the war, it is impossible to understand how every communist government from Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Rumania was dominated by Jews.
(9) The Germans had no method for disposing of the bodies of the millions of Jews supposedly murdered at Auschwitz.
The crematory ovens which existed at Auschwitz had a disposal capacity consistent with the actual number of deaths from disease. The disposal capacity did not even remotely approach the millions of deaths claimed.
(10) The numbers keep coming down.
The number of deaths in the western camps has been drastically reduced. The Auschwitz death toll has been reduced from the Nuremberg four million to fewer than one million. Both numbers are still well above the 74,000 deaths recorded in the Auschwitz death books.
Jewish claims of millions of deaths by "gassing" cannot be substantiated by elementary cross-checking. Neither the German war time records, the constantly changing downsized death numbers, the internal activities of the camps, the analysis of Allied intelligence, the silence of the Vatican or the criminal prosecutions of the German judiciary support any such interpretations.
The Jews have a very real problem. They have lied on a colossal scale. In the process they have deceived many of their own people as well as the world. The political repercussions would be disastrous if the truth ever got out. That, Dear Reader, is the reason that "Holocaust Denial" laws exist in Germany and all over Europe. Be grateful that you still live in the land of the First Amendment. You can be fired from your job, have your career destroyed and be turned into an unemployable social outcast. But you cannot be thrown into jail-yet. That will have to wait until Michael Chertoff can classify "Holocaust Denial" as a form of intellectual terrorism-and then you can read Arthur Butz upside down while hanging from your toes at Guantanamo Bay.
Auschwitz Jews Were Not Registered
Insights on the 1944 Deportations of Hungarian Jews
What Happened to the Jews Who Were Deported to Auschwitz but Were Not Registered There?
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n4p-4_Graf.html
Holocaust Fundamentalism: You WILL Believe
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/holocaustfundamentalist.php
The word "Holocaust" (always to be placed in quotation marks) designates the triple myth of the alleged genocide of the Jews, the alleged Nazi gas chambers, and the alleged number of six million Jewish victims of the Second World War.
Noted CA Prof States His Opinion Of The Holocaust
An MEHR Interview with Dr. Abdullah Mohammad Sindi
A Saudi Professor of Political Science
http://www.rense.com/general69/noted.htm
A Real Holocaust of World War Two:
January 26 has been proclaimed as International Real Holocaust Remembrance Day to commemorate the holocaust of over SIX MILLION German Christians as a result of World War II.
A Review of James Bacque's "Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation 1944-1950"
Canadian historian James Bacque's new book, "Crimes and Mercies" [Little, Brown], is a sequel to his 1989 work "Other Losses".
While the latter focused on the fate of millions of German POWs at the end of the Second World War, more than a million of whom the Allies deliberately left to die of a synergistic combination of disease, exposure, and starvation, his current book focuses largely on the grim, post-war fate of 60 million German civilians.
Published this September, "Crimes and Mercies" is over 300 pages in length. These include over 30 maps, photos, and illustrations; a foreword by historian and legal scholar, Alfred de Zayas, and an introduction by the author; eight chapters of text, as well as an index, bibliography, notes, and appendices.
But it is probably on page 131 that we find the epicenter of the book, and its seismic thesis; it is here, in a little, statistical chart, that Bacque's findings may be seen in a single glance.
"Expellees" refers to the 16,000,000 ethnic Germans who were driven from their ancestral homelands in Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and elsewhere in Europe, at war's end.
These included mostly women and children and elderly men who, with a few belongings in hand and running the gauntlet of deep, local animosity, set out upon the open road toward the rump state of Germany.
"Prisoners" are, of course, the German POWs, the subject of Bacque's first book.
"Residents" here refers to the German civilian population that survived the Second World War.
According to Bacque, given the extraordinarily harsh conditions imposed upon them by the Allies (i.e., the British, French, Soviets, and Americans), at least 9.3 million and possibly as many as 13.7 million Germans, had, by 1950, needlessly died as a result.
He writes: "This is many more Germans than died in battle, air raids, and concentration camps during the war. Millions of these people slowly starved to death in front of the victors' eyes every day for years."
Adding: "These deaths have never been honestly reported by either the Allies or the German government."
It is this dishonesty, which is also part silence, part indifference, part anti-German animus, as well as corrupt scholarship, that Bacque intends to remedy with the present volume.
Weaving in and out of the central storyline are a number of recurring motifs.
There is the exposure of the unabashed inhumanity of the Allied leadership: Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin, and De Gaulle.
But it is the U.S. Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., who is the arch-villain of the piece, the one who hatched the serpent's egg: the vicious, vengeful Morgenthau Plan for the post-war "pastoralization" (read: the de-industrialization and abject subjugation) of the German people. Devised, "cancelled”, then implemented via the punitive directive JCS/1067, the Morgenthau Plan wreaked havoc on the German economy and, by extension, the fragile European economy.
Because of it, post-war reconstruction in Germany was delayed until late 1948; by which time millions of German civilians had already perished.
By starkest contrast, the hero of the book--and to whom it is dedicated--is Herbert Hoover.
It was Hoover who, in a spirit of Christian charity and true to his Quaker roots, led a worldwide food relief effort during the post-war era; saving, in the process, Bacque claims, probably as many as 800 million lives; a headspinner in a history book full of such daunting statistics.
Hoover also lobbied for a food program to relieve the desperate conditions inside Germany, which, along with the Marshall Plan, helped put an end to the Morgenthau nightmare and rescued literally millions of people from a slow, agonizing death.
Bacque also shines a hard light on the Western media, from the "New York Times" on down, for concealing or outrightly denying the Allies' complicity in numerous atrocities; on their craven betrayal of the anti-Hitler German resistance, the anti-Soviet Cossacks, and the Free Poles; and on the hideous cruelties they, as victors, inflicted on weak, defenseless, but fearless, Germen women seeking to help ill and starving husbands interned in Allied POW camps.
Bacque's determination to shine a hard light on some long-hidden and neglected truths regarding the Western Allies and their often inglorious actions during and after World War Two will, as sure as night follows day, provoke the animus of the coterie of mythologists who have dined out on simplistic notions of Allied heroism and decency--and exclusively German villainy--for the past half-century.
Recalling his bumpy ride following the release of "Other Losses", historian James Bacque expects that a firestorm will likewise follow the publication of "Crimes and Mercies".
Up in Canada, in the letters page of the "Toronto Globe and Mail", a debate has already begun; and signs of bitchery, if not nastiness, are already evident.
But what is encouraging is that Bacque also fully expects that the truth about this tragic page of German history will at long last be made known.
The problem is the average life span in 2000 for Europeans was about 75 years. [1] The year 2000 was 55 years after the end of it. [2] So if all ages from newborn to the elderly were among the survivors then 55/75th have died since 1945 and the number alive in 2000 equals 20/75th of the number in 1945, a bit less than 1/3 of them.
Elementary algebra [4] says if there were one million alive in the year 2000 then there were 3.75 million holocaust survivors alive in 1945. That is a huge number.
But wait! There's more!
If the Nazis killed those unable to work it gets worse. Let’s assume 13 years old is old enough to work. So in 1945 the youngest survivor was 13. That means it is as though there were one million survivors in the year 2012. As that is 67 years after it ended then 67/75ths have died and one million represents 8/75ths of the survivors in 1945. That means there were roughly 9.375 million holocaust survivors in 1945.
Pick any unable-to-work age you want down to newborn and still we are left with 3.5 million in 1945 as the minimum number of holocaust survivors. But if we have newborns surviving then we have a good fraction of women taking care of the children and thus not working. That weighs against the trademarked Pure Nazi Evil. Not working everyone to death stains the trademark of Pure Nazi Evil.
We must conclude the official number asserted for purposes of claiming compensation is either a lie for the purpose of extortion or there was no extermination in the holy holocaust. And if the former is a lie, lying in one leads to a reasonable assumption of lying in all and it is up to the liar to show he is not lying this time.
OTOH we can look at the 1945 Red Cross numbers for all concentration camp survivors as 120,000. That means there should be 33,000 survivors today assuming no extermination of those unable to work. Assuming extermination of those unable to work as under 13 we have roughly 10,000 survivors. If we expand camp survivors to those who survived by hiding either their identity or physically perhaps the number can be doubled or even tripled before one cannot keep a straight face saying it.
Norman Finkelstein quotes his mother as asking, "If all of these people are survivors, who did Hitler kill"?
I can add to her consternation. Every conceivable modification to the data short of a fountain of youth for holocaust survivors, short of increasing their life expectancy, increases the number of survivors in 1945. Evan a million survivors in 1945 (no one died in 55 years) begs the question of what does holocaust mean.
In a larger context we can look at the distribution of Jews in Europe during WWII and at its maximum expansion only 3 to 4 million Jews lived under Nazi rule. Taking the official number of one million without extermination of those unable to work we have every Jew who was at any time under Nazi rule claiming to be a holocaust survivor. So again, whom did Hitler kill? [URL to Jewish 1938 population figures produced by Jews not knowing the later mythology was coming]
[1] Life expectancy in 1945 was on the order of 67 years overall for Europe but included unsanitary eastern Europe of about 10 years shorter where most of this holocaust is supposed to have happened. However this changes nothing as those who had the poor lifestyle as young adults in eastern Europe would be dead before 2000 even if they had a 75 year life expectancy in 1945. This 75-year life expectancy applies mainly to the youngest in 1945. On average it applies to those 20 and younger in 1945.
[2] The first approximation rule of demographics is there an equal number in all age groups. To make it easy, say the population is 75 million. That would mean 1 million aged 0-1, 1 million age 1-2 and so forth up to 1 million aged 74-75. Of course no population is a first order approximation. But all the interesting aspects of demographics are departures from this ideal. For purposes of this discussion the only interest is the Z-shaped curve around the average life expectancy. These days the Z-curve has a large number living much longer than the average but in fact there is an equally large number dying before the average age. If it were otherwise the average life expectancy would increase so the same considerations are always true. They are kept true by moving the baseline. It is also true that 75 is not good for all European countries but it is close enough for this exercise.
[3] In this case "close enough" means there is no official source of the number rather there is a ballpark range of numbers that different groups adopt as the true number.
[4]
20
-- X population-in-1945 = 1,000,000
75
Tall Tales of a Roman Holocaust:
Here are two early "Holocaust" tales from the Talmud: Gittin 57b. Claims that four billion Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar. Gittin 58a claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans. (Ancient demography indicates that there were not 16 million Jews in the entire world at that time, much less 16 million Jewish children, or four billion Jews).
The Holocaust before It Happened
http://www.ziopedia.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4362&Itemid=99&mosmsg=Thanks+for+your+vote%21
George Santayana was famous for his aphorism "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”. Perhaps those who believe in the myth of the `six million' have forgotten that Jews were making substantially similar claims regarding `six million' Jews about to perish in the aftermath of World War One.
WORLD WAR II
The JEWS Declared War - AGAINST Germany!
NOT the Other Way Around!
http://www.honestmediatoday.com/kind_of_people_who_censor_tv.htm
It was the JEWS who wanted to destroy Germany AND ALL Germans so they could control ALL of Europe – and DESTROY another Christian nation, something they unfortunately (for humanity) were able to accomplish AFTER World War II.
The Jews NOW control the government of Germany COMPLETELY!
Holocaust Profiteers Celebrate Shakedown
http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=3&ar=35
The Holocaust Industry extorted $9 Billion from Europe in the name of "needy Holocaust victims”. Here's what the money was really for...
No More Holocaust Reparations
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,2968661,00.html?maca=en-bulletin-433-html
Regardless of what you thin actually happened during WW2, the guilty are dead, the government that authorized it all is gone, and the vast majority of Jews and Germans alive today had not been born in 1940 and cannot be held liable for OR BENEFICIARIES OF, what really happened in the middle of the last century.
I applaud Germany for putting their foot down and saying that enough is enough.
Remarkable Nonsense about the Holocaust
http://www.ziopedia.org/articles/holocaust%10revisionism/remarkable_nonsense_about_the_holocaust/
Because the Holocaust has become in many ways a secular religion -- even for those who are not Jewish -- one is not permitted to say anything that can in any way be construed as less than fawning about the plight of the Jews in Europe. Likewise, one is permitted to say just about anything that supports the popular view of the Holocaust, no matter how erroneous or wrong-headed. Here are some passages that contain remarkable nonsense about the Holocaust.
Atty Sylvia Stolz - 'Breakthrough On The Holocaust Front'
http://www.rense.com/general80/front.htm
Note - Sylvia Stolz is the defense attorney who was recently sentenced to three-and-a-half years behind bars for defending Ernst Zundel. She is engaged to Horst MAHLER, one of Germany's high profile "Holocaust Denier" dissidents. Mahler is a brilliant but controversial attorney, disbarred in Germany for his politically incorrect views.
This book traces the history of the ancient Khazar Empire, a major but almost forgotten power in Eastern Europe, which in the Dark Ages became converted to Judaism. Khazaria was finally wiped out by the forces of Genghis Khan, but evidence indicates that the Khazars themselves migrated to Poland and formed the cradle of Western Jewry…
NOTE: Perpetrators of the holocaust against Christian Russia pass themselves off
as "survivors" of a holocaust. http://www.russians.org/communist.html
"The only two non-Jews in the communist conspiracy were Chambers and Hiss...Every other one was a Jew and it raised hell with us."
"In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed, the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.
"The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people.
Holocaust Problems vs. Jew Lies
http://www.rense.com/general70/hhl.htm
The Holocaust Industry extorted $9 Billion from Europe in the name of "needy Holocaust victims”. Here's what the money was really for...
A copy of this book was recently offered on American Book Exchange for $1000. It has been either sold of withdrawn. Other copies of what appear to be the same book are much less, and I acquired two copies, one for myself and our good comrade, "Bill The Hermit", whose essays appear on several websites, including Ziopedia. Read his short review to get an idea of what is in this fascinating book. As I have said for sometime, some of the most interesting books about Judaics and their doings are written by themselves. Several old photos are quite revealing, telling the observant reader as much as the chapters themselves.
NOTE: Jewish Bolsheviks Murdered 66 Million In Russia
http://www.rense.com/general77/bols.htm
If not exaggerated, Solzhenitsyn asserts that since 1917, the Bolsheviks, continuing under assassin Stalin, through and even after WW2, systematically executed, and inside (and outside) their thousands of Gulags, worked, starved and froze to death, SIXTY-SIX million people, not all, but most of them CHRISTIANS (whom the Bolsheviks hated). This mass death was THE LARGEST REAL "HOLOCAUST" in modern history - but totally unknown today by most Americans, British, and western Europeans and absent from our school books. Of course no publisher in the Western world dares reprint Solzhenitsyn's book in English.
http://www.conspiracyworld.com/index0064.htm
JEWS WANT THE WORLD to believe that they have a monopoly on “Holocaust Remembrances.” But Ukraine’s President Viktor Yushchenko has thrown the Jews a curve by dedicating 2008 as “Ukrainian Holocaust Remembrance Year” Here.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/19/europe/ukraine.php
This “holocaust remembrance” recalls the murder by forced starvation of *6 million* Ukrainian Christians by the Jewish Bolsheviks. The Ukrainians call this holocaust “Holodomor” which means “Famine-Genocide.” Of course the Zionist Jews deny it, just like they deny all of their numerous crimes against humanity.
In June 1925 in Geneva the question was once again discussed, one reached the so-called Geneva Gas-War Protocol. Out of the 44 nations attending the Geneva conference 38 had, by the end of 1935, signed the protocol. 21 nations took reservation, 17 were reluctant. By the end of 1935, 28 nations had ratified the convention. But 10 refused, among those were USA, Japan, Czechoslovakia, Luxemburg, and various nations in South America. The Reich signed without any reservations.
During WWI the American company under leadership of General Amos A Fries (1), developed weapon based on chemicals. The General was manager of "Chemical Warfare Service". After 1919 General Amos A Fries wrote a lot of articles claiming chemical weapons were the solution to new wars. Chemical weapons were human, and chemical weapons must be looked upon as blessing in wars. During the early negotiations leading up to the Hague conference in 1899, the use of gas was an important topic. The USA was for use of toxic gas and that chemical weapons were human. (1)
At the start of WWII both sides had poisonous shells. Bombs with poison were not at hand in Germany. (2) "The use of gas was strictly forbidden in the Wehrmacht! Even the use of gas as answer to such bombs used against Germany needed Hitler's clearing. ... No use of chemical weapons could be used without Hitler's approval. Such weapons should only be stored inside Germany." (3) During the war Hitler refused many proposals by the General Staff to use poisonous gas against partisans on the Eastern Front (4). Hitler said "No!" He did not want such weapons used by the German Army at any front.
Incident in Poland:
The first incident involving poisonous gas in WWII occurred on the evening of Friday, September 8, 1939 in the village of Jaslo in the south of Poland. (5) Polish troops had tried to blow up a railway bridge over the river Jasiolka. The Poles had used a chemical bomb(6)
As German soldiers from 1. Gebirges-Pionere.Battalion 82 (a battalion of engineer infantry) came to clear the bridge it exploded. The engineer soldiers found the Poles had used a chemical explosive - but that explosive had not exploded - as it exploded 14 solders became mustard gas victims, two of the soldiers died.
An investigation by the German High Command explained that they did not have conventional explosives that used poison gas mines. The LOST (6) mines were, as the German High Command investigation revealed, fabricated in England. (7) The Germans did not take revenge on the Polish army.
Churchill's plans of using poison gas:
In 1940 England had plans to use poisonous gas should Germany start an invasion of England. Sir john Dill, Chief of the British Empire General Staff, tried hard in a memorandum of June 18, 1940 to influence Churchill, even though neither Germany nor Italy had chemical weapons,, to start using such weapons.(8) On June 30, 1940 Prime Minister Churchill ordered General Ismay to prepare for use of chemical weapons. He said: "It is my intention not to wait too long before England shall use chemical weapons." (9) In his book on the war and especially regarding chemical warfare Günther W Gellermann writes: "Churchill has ready to use chemical weapons should Germany start an invasion of England, even though such weapons could harm the British (10)." According to Gellermann this shows how callous Churchill was towards the people of England.
In April 1942, Churchill offered Stalin 1,000 tons of mustard gas. Stalin however did not want the gas; he wanted 5,000 tons of Chlorine (11), which he would use to produce his own chemical weapons.
On May 10, 1942 Churchill declared in a radio-speech that the reason for Germany's advances in Russia was because they used chemical weapons. Furthermore, he said: "We know the Huns, which is the reason why we are keeping up our afford, and why we are building up our storage of chemical weapons. I would say that should Germany again attack our ally, Soviet, with more chemical weapons, then we will start using such gas in our attacks on German cities and towns." (12)
The Gas-Catastrophe in Bari (you will find what USA said about this at the end of the article)
For years the allies kept a strict secret around what happened in Bari in December of 1943. (13)
The allies did not tell the Italian authorities that one of the American merchant ships had mustard gas on board. Had they told, many civilian Italians could have been saved. I would even say that many allied soldiers could have been saved had the Americans had enough equipment and medicine at hand to treat mustard gas victims.
The US merchant Ship John Harvey, 10617 BRT, came on November 28, 1943, her skipper was Captain Edwin F Knowles from Baltimore, Maryland. The ship had 540 tons (14) of mustard gas on board. Only seven US soldiers and their commanding officer, Lieutenant Howard Beckström knew about the mustard gas while none of the crew or the ship captain knew.
On December 2, 1943 the German Luftwaffen with JU 88-bombers attacked the 30 US-transport ships in Bari. The Germans sank 17 ships and damaged 8 more (15). This was almost a Pearl Harbor in the Mediterranean. During the bomb attack the ship John Harvey caught fire, exploded, and sank. In the explosion the mustard gas was set free. All those who knew about the mustard gas died. USA did not tell about the gas onboard the John Harvey (16) which led to the poisoning of 328 soldiers and sailors of whom 96 died. Even the number of civilians that died due to mustard gad poisonings was kept quiet. The allies said the dead either died from burning or bronchitis or lung problems (17). Churchill ordered British medical personnel not to tell what the reason was. (18) First in 1974 did English documents come to light which told the reason.
Crimes by Anglo-American:
The German scientist Fritz Hahn found in an archive in Washington DC plans (19) showing that USA planned a gas-war against Germany. According to the US-plans they should start a 15 day operation "using gas bombs after the Axis-Countries have started the bombing". (With the knowledge we have today such propaganda would have been easy to fabricate. (RJH) The attacks on Germany should come from Foggia in Italy and England. 30 German cities and towns should be drowned in mustard gas and/or by use of Carbonylchlorid, COCl. The result of this operation was calculated to 5.6 million dead and 12 million very sick Germans - so sick they would need medical attention for a long time. German cities like Munich, Augsburg, Stuttgart, and Karlsruhe were the main targets of the plan. Carbonylchlorid, COCl. This was one of the points in the plan, No 4. Foggio was not far away from Bari. Pr square Mile (European) or 6.2 statute miles. The Americans meant to use 100 air planes with 500 pound Carbonylchlorid, each. Totally the Americans meant to drop 280,000,000 Lb poisonous gas over Germany. (20)
It was first in 1984 when the world learns the truth about English plans regarding using poisonous gas over Germany. The BBC reporter Robert Harris (21) found documents regarding the use of biological weapons against Germany in WWII. These documents clearly show what England's war-time minister wanted to do. According to these documents, the chief of the British high command, General Hastings Lionel, quoted Churchill: "I want a cold blooded war effort to be started and the use of poisonous gas ... When we start this I do want everybody to go for it with all they got. I want sound people to start the planning and not allow any psalm-singer to stop us from what we are about to do”. (22) Churchill also said: "We can bomb the cities along the Rhein and many other cities and towns so hard sprinkled with gas that most of the people will have to have medical care for the rest of their lives. And we will do this by using poisonous gas." (23) Churchill had no moral scruples when he gave his instructions.
According to Japanese historian, Yoshiaki Yoshimi (24) who found proofs of this in an archive in Maryland USA, asked: Did the Americans in the last days of WWII use chemical weapons against Japan? The use of chemical weapons should kill about 200,000 Japanese.
Remarks:
1. Hugh R Slotten in "The Journal of American History," 77
2. Günther W Gellermann, "der Krieg, der nicht statfand", Bertelsmann Greafe veralg, Koblenz 1986, p 134
3 Ebeda
4 Gellermann and others
5 Ebeda p 135 ff. Also told by Fritz Hahn "Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres 1933-1945", Bernhard & Graefe Verlag, Koblenz 1986 p 335
6 LOST: come from the letters used by the chemists Lommel und Steinkopf. Mustard gas delivered during WWI.
7 Gellermann and others p 137
8 Ebeda p 141
9 Ebeda
10 Ebeda p 142
11 Ebeda p 159
12 Ebeda
13 Ebeda p 160 - 164.
14 See Gellermann p 160
15 See Gellerman p 163
16 See Gellermann p 163
17 Gellermann p 163
18 Gellermann p 163
19 Der Spiegel from October 24, 1988 p 81. Der Spoegel is a German monthly newspaper
20 Ebeda p 85
21 London Times from May 1, 1981
22 der Spiegel from October 24, 1988 p 85
23 Stuttgarter Nachrichten from May 2, 1981 /A German newspaper issued in Stuttgart
24 Die Welt from July 8, 1991 (Die Welt is a German newspaper.)
2. This is what US-authorities tell about the disaster at Bari:
(Since this is not part of what Dr Heinrich Wendig in booklet 3, I have shorten it)
One of the most disastrous bombing attacks against allied ships during the entire war took place at Bari, Italy, on December 2, 1943. This port was in the British theatre of operations, but several American [merchant] ships with [U.S. Navy] Armed Guards aboard were at Bari on that fateful day [when a German air raid occurred]. When the last bomb had fallen, and the last ship exploded, and the large fires had run their course, 17 ships had been sunk and six damaged. There were five United States ships sunk and one damaged. One other United States ship came through unscathed.
To overcome the outright lies and audacity - in Yiddish Chutzpah, the truth, in facts, must be spread, loud and clear ...
Please forward this article to all your friends, and to those who are aware that something is drastically wrong in this world, but can't understand what is happening; teach them, and they will learn.
Heil og sael
randulf.johan.hansen@c2i.net
Note: If you have views regarding this article please feel free to contact me, or if you wish to be removed from this list, please advise, and you will be taken off.
"I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement is quite correct-not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers', a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war.
Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war." - Richard Lynn Professor Emeritus
University of Ulster, December 5, 2005
"Holocaust Myth 101"
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/101/101toc.html
This English document comes in eight parts. It is the original document on which the following translations are based. It summarizes the following eight Revisionist claims, broadly sketched:
PART I - The Holocaust is useful postwar propaganda that started as a systematic, insidious campaign during World War II as one of the tactics employed by moneyed interests to rally the troops and engage the world, specifically America, in what turned out to be, essentially, a fratricidal war.
PART II - There is no proof that the Holocaust, as depicted by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby and the highly politicized Hollywood industry, actually occurred.
PART III - The numbers of "Holocaust" victims are irresponsibly exaggerated.
PART IV - Official state policy towards the Jews in the Third Reich was emigration, not extermination.
PART V - Not a single document has been found with Hitler's signature ordering the extermination of the Jews.
PART VI - Zyklon B was a fumigant. It wasn't a practical agent for mass murder.
PART VII - Zyklon B was highly toxic. This being so, it would have been foolish and counterproductive to endanger Third Reich personnel engaged in allegedly pulling bodies from the execution chambers shortly after they were "gassed."
PART VIII - American execution expert, Fred Leuchter, delivered a scientific break-through in proving that the so-called gas chambers at Auschwitz could not have been used for their alleged purpose."
The translations below were done by volunteers across the globe from the English document. Where there are discrepancies, the original document governs.
DEUTSCH
Part I - Behauptung der Revisionisten: Der Holocaust ist nutzenbringende Nachkriegspropaganda, die als eine systematische, heimtückische Kampagne während des Zweiten Weltkrieges begann, als eine der Strategien der Hochfinanz, Truppen zusammenzuziehen und die Welt, insbesondere Amerika, in einen Krieg hineinzuziehen, der, wie sich herausstellte, im Grunde ein Bruderkrieg war.
Part II - Behauptung der Revisionisten: Es gibt keinen Beweis dafür, daß der Holocaust, so wie er von der Holocaust Promotion Lobby und der extrem politisierten Hollywood-Filmindustrie dargestellt wird, tatsächlich stattgefunden hat.
Part III - Behauptung der Revisionisten: Die Zahl der "Holocaust"-Opfer ist in unverantwortlicher Weise übertrieben worden.
Part IV - Behauptung der Revisionisten: Die offizielle Politik des Dritten Reiches gegenüber den Juden war Emigration, nicht Ausrottung.
Part V - Behauptung der Revisionisten: Es ist nicht ein einziges Dokument mit Hitlers Unterschrift gefunden worden, das die Ausrottung der Juden angeordnet hätte.
Part VI - Behauptung der Revisionisten: Zyklon B war ein Entlausungsmittel. Es war für einen Massenmord ungeeignet.
Part VII - Behauptung der Revisionisten: Zyklon B ist hochgiftig. Damit wäre es töricht und kontraproduktiv gewesen, Arbeitskräfte des Dritten Reiches zu gefährden, indem man sie angeblich Leichen aus den Gaskammern ziehen ließ, kurz nachdem diese "vergast" wurden.
Part VIII - Behauptung der Revisionisten: Dem amerikanischen Hinrichtungsexperten Fred Leuchter gelang ein wissenschaftlicher Durchbruch, indem er bewies, daß die sogenannten Gaskammern von Auschwitz nicht für ihren angeblichen Zweck hätten benutzt werden können.
Holocaust Problems vs. Jew Lies
http://www.rense.com/general70/hhl.htm
The Holocaust consists of three basic elements: (1) Approximately six million Jews were deliberately killed. (2) These killings were part of a state sponsored program on the part of the Third Reich whose ultimate goal was the total eradication of the Jewish people. (3) The bulk of these murders took place in special death camps where the principal mechanism of execution was the homicidal gas chamber that utilized Zyclon B, a commercial pesticide whose active ingredient was hydrogen cyanide.
That the Third Reich possessed the technological and administrative means to carry out such a vast amount of killing there is little doubt. The Soviet Union with significantly inferior assets in these areas was able to kill far greater numbers of human beings. Furthermore, the armies of the Third Reich succeeded in killing at least ten million of its heavily armed military opponents in the course of World War II. Hence the killing of six million unarmed civilians should not have presented any unique problems to such an industrially advanced and bureaucratically efficient state as Nazi Germany, on the contrary, it would have been far easier.
My doubts about the Holocaust are not centered on whether it could have happened but whether it did happen. In fact many of the doubts that I have are a direct consequence of the fact that I have no doubt that it actually could have happened...but certainly not in the ways that have been described thus far in the "official" literature.
It is part of the Western tradition in legal, scientific, and intellectual matters that those asserting something have the burden of proof and that those who disagree are not required to provide evidence. This tradition however has been turned on its head regarding the holocaust since the "historical truth" of the holocaust has been posited in advance. Furthermore, even to express doubts can result in criminal penalties in at least 11 so-called democratic countries and the ruining of lives and careers in numerous others.
Listed below are some of the "problems” I have with the Holocaust. Should these be cleared up it would go a long way toward my accepting it - they are in no particular order:
1) Why did Elie Wiesel and countless other Jews survive the Holocaust if it was the intention of the Third Reich to eliminate every Jew they got there hands on? Elie was a prisoner for several years; other Jews survived even longer. Most of these "survivors" were ordinary people who did not have any unique expertise that the Germans could have exploited for their war effort. There was no logical reason for them to be kept alive. The very existence of more than a million survivors even today, some sixty years later, contradicts one of the basic components of the holocaust i.e. that the Germans had a policy to eliminate every Jew they got their hands on.
2) Why is their no mention of the Holocaust in Churchill's six volume History of the Second World War or the wartime memoirs of either De Gaulle or Eisenhower or any of the other lesser luminaries who wrote about the Second World War? Keep in mind all these were written years after the war ended and thus after the holocaust had been allegedly proven by the Nuremberg Trials? With regard to the Holocaust, the silence of these “cognoscenti " is deafening!
3) What was an inmate infirmary (and a brothel) doing in Auschwitz if in fact it was a death camp?
4) Why would the Germans round up Jews from their far flung empire, thereby tying up large numbers of personnel and rolling stock, while fighting a world war on two fronts to deliver people to "death camps" hundreds of miles away who were then executed upon arrival - wouldn't a bullet on the spot have appealed to legendary German sense of efficiency?
5) Why after sixty years have historians been unable to come up with a single German document that points to a holocaust? Should we believe the likes of Raul Hilburg that in the place of written orders there was an "incredible meeting of the minds" by the literally tens of thousands of people who would have had to coordinate their actions in order to carry out an undertaking of this magnitude.
6) How come it is still insisted upon that six million Jews were killed when the official Jewish death toll at Auschwitz, the flagship of the Holocaust gulag, has been reduced from an immediate post war figure of 3 million, to a figure of somewhat less than one million? Why do many respond to this observation by saying, “what’s the difference whether it's six million or one million". The answer is that the difference is five million. Another difference is that saying so can get you three years in an Austrian jail...just ask David Irving!
7) All of Germany's wartime codes were compromised including the one used to send daily reports from Auschwitz to Berlin. The transcripts of these messages make no mention of mass executions or even remotely suggest a genocidal program in progress. Furthermore it has been insisted that the Germans used a kind of euphemistic code when discussing their extermination program of the Jews e.g. final solution, special treatment, resettlement, etc. Why was it necessary for them to use such coded euphemisms when talking to one another unless they thought their codes had been cracked by the Allies?
8) The water table at Auschwitz lies a mere 18 inches below the surface which makes claims of huge burning pits for the disposal of tens of thousands of victims untenable.
9) Initially claims were made that mass executions in homicidal gas chambers had taken place in camps located within the boundaries of the old Reich e.g. Dachau, Bergen-Belsen. "Evidence" to that effect was every bit as compelling as what was offered for other camps, located in occupied Poland, yet without explanation in the early sixties we were told that this was not the case and that all the "death camps" were located in the East i.e. Poland outside (some would say conveniently) of the probing eyes of western scholars.
10) No one has been able to reconcile the eyewitness accounts that personnel entered the gas chambers after twenty minutes without any protective gear and the fact that Zyclon B was a "time release" fumigant that would have had a lethal capability for at least another twenty-four hours. And that even after twenty-four hours the corpses would have themselves remained sufficiently contaminated by the hydrogen cyanide gas that they would have had the capacity to kill anyone who touched them who were not wearing protective gear.
11) Why do we no longer hear claims that the Germans manufactured soap, lampshades, and riding britches from the bodies of dead Jews - could it be that in the light of modern forensics and DNA knowledge these claims are totally untenable?
12) Why do we no longer hear claims that huge numbers of Jews were exterminated in massive steam chambers or electrocuted on special grids - "evidence" of this was presented at Nuremberg - evidence that sent men to the gallows.
14) Elie Wiesel has been described as "the Apostle of Remembrance" yet in his memoir, "Night" which deals his stay at Auschwitz he makes no mention of the now infamous homicidal gas chambers. Isn't this a bit like one of the Gospels making no mention of the Cross?
15) Virtually every survivor who was examined at Auschwitz says that he or she was examined by the infamous Dr. Mengele.
16) According to survivor testimony, hundreds of thousands of Jews were executed at Treblinka and then buried in mass graves in the surrounding area. Why is it that extensive sonar probing of these burial grounds reveals that this alleged final resting place for Holocaust victims has remained undisturbed since at least the last ice age?
17) "Proof" of the holocaust rest primarily on survivor testimony; there little if any hard evidence. The best of this has been described by Jean Claude Pressac as merely "criminal traces". Even Judge Grey who presided at the Irving-Lipstadt Trial commented that he was surprised the evidence pointing to the Holocaust was "extremely thin". To paraphrase Arthur Butz, "a crime of this magnitude would have left a mountain of evidence" - where is it? There was more hard evidence against OJ Simpson at his trial and he was FOUND INNOCENT!
18) Why has Holocaust Revisionism been criminalized in at least eleven countries - what other historic truth needs the threat of prison or the destruction of one's career to maintain itself. Should someone be sent to prison for expressing skepticism about the official Chinese claim that they suffered thirty-five million dead in World War II.
19) Why do the court historians insist that "denying the Holocaust" is like denying slavery or saying the earth is flat when it is nothing of the sort? The leading Revisionists are first-rate scholars who hold advanced degrees from the world's leading universities. Is there anyone comparable among those who say the world is flat or that slavery never existed?
20) Promoters of the Holocaust have expressed concerns about the remembering the holocaust once the last survivors die. Why haven't Civil War historians expressed similar concerns since the last survivor of that conflict died in 1959?
21) Survivors of the holocaust have testified that smoke billowed from the crematoriums as they consumed the bodies of murdered victims - some eyewitnesses even claimed they could detect national origins by the color of the smoke. How can this be reconciled with the fact that properly operating crematoriums do not produce smoke of any color?
22) According to the official version of the Holocaust hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were rounded up in mid 1944 and sent to Auschwitz where most were gassed immediately upon arrival and their bodies were disposed of by burning in huge open air pits using railroad ties and gasoline. Why is that there is no evidence of these huge funerary pyres in the high resolution surveillance photos taken by Allied aircraft who were over flying the camp on a daily basis during this time period. Furthermore, why have no remains been found, since open pit burning, even when gasoline is used, generates insufficient heat to totally consume a body?
23) All of the liberated camps were littered with corpses; is there a single autopsy report or any other forensic evidence that shows that even a single one of these deaths was a consequence of poison gas?
24) The death toll for the Holocaust relies exclusively on population statistics provided by Jewish sources; has any independent demographic study been produced that shows that approximately six million Jews were "missing" at the end of the war.
25) Why do the wartime inspection reports of camps made by the International Red Cross contain no references to mass executions - it strains credulity that such monumental crimes could be hidden. The only explanations are that either these crimes were not occurring or that the Red Cross was complicit in a cover up.
26) Why has there been no effort to respond to the Leuchter Report?
27) "The Holocaust was technologically possible because it happened ". Why is this intellectually bankrupt argument, which turns scholarship on its head, considered by the promoters of the Holocaust as historical truth, considered a sufficient response to the mounting Revisionist evidence to the contrary?
28) What other historical truths rely to the extent that the holocaust does on so-called "eye witness" testimony - and why have none of these witnesses ever been cross examined?
29) According to the official version of the Holocaust, the Jews remained ignorant of their fate until the very end so skillful were their Nazis murderers in deceiving their victims. How can this ignorance be reconciled with the fact that the Jews have historically been as a group, the most literate and highly informed people on the planet with legendary access to the highest echelons of government?
NOTE: Ilya Ehrenberg - The Man Who Invented The 'Six Million'
http://www.rense.com/general75/ehr.htm
He was a prolific writer, celebrated author of various novels and other works of fiction. He was the top Soviet propagandist during the Second World War. He was a notorious liar and a pathological monster. He was a Jew.
First and foremost, I want to congratulate you on your official nomination for the Democratic Party. During the primary season, you have been challenged and tested on several fronts ranging from your patriotism, religion, and even your readiness to lead. Through all the heartbreaks and emotional roller coasters, the fruits of your labor have finally been rewarded.
Infrared radiation is heat-producing and invisible wavelengths lying between visible light and microwave on the electromagnetic spectrum. "Near" infrared is closest to visible light and "far" or "deep" infrared is closer to microwave. Far infrared waves are thermal and cause increased molecular vibrational activity. In other words, infrared radiation is heat.
Israel's Laser Weapon:
There are indications, according to the physicist, that such a weapon was used when the KAL plane was shot down over Kamchatka (Soviet Union) in September 1983. In the early 90s, this technology returned to scientific discussions in the West and the technology itself appears to have been transferred from the Soviet Union.
Since 1995, the United States and Israel have actively developed an advanced infrared beam weapon under a joint "anti-missile" program known as the Tactical High-Energy Laser (THEL). The THEL is a mobile, high-energy laser weapon.
Although the THEL laser weapon was designed, developed and produced by a TRW-led team of U.S. and Israeli contractors for the U.S. Army Space & Missile Defense Command, Huntsville, Ala. and the Israel Ministry of Defense, "requirements for the system have been driven by Israel," according to TRW and industry reports. Lasers are the leading edge of directed energy weapons. Laser weapons have been under active development for twenty years and easily constitute the most advanced of the directed-energy devices. In 1984, Jeff Hecht, author of Beam Weapons: The Next Arms Race, wrote, "The military 'destructor beam' definitely is in our future tactical arsenal." The advanced technology and plasma physics involved in directed-energy weapons give them unprecedented lethal power. Among their more important features are:
The ability to fire energy "bullets" at or near the speed of light;
The ability to redirect their fire toward multiple targets very rapidly;
Their very long range; and
Their ability to transmit lethal doses of energy in seconds or even a fraction of a second.
No conventional ammunition is required — only fuel for the power generator is needed.
The THEL is part of a joint program known as Nautilus, in which the US Army and the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD) have developed infrared laser weapon systems. The prime contractor, TRW Space and Electronics Group, has been involved in the development of high-energy laser systems since the early 1970s. A host of Israeli engineers and companies are involved in the program including the aerospace companies Rafael, Israel Aircraft Industries and Tadiran.
The THEL is a mobile system ostensibly designed to destroy rockets, such as the Russian-made Katyusha. The THEL employs the Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser (MIRACL). The MIRACL is a megawatt-class, deuterium- fluoride chemical laser. The weapon's systems can be transported in one or two shipping containers.
The THEL first successfully destroyed a short-range rocket in flight on Feb. 9, 1996. As a result, the US and Israel began joint development of a Tactical High Energy Laser/Rapid Acquisition Demonstrator (THEL/RAD) system.
In April 1996, President Clinton and Secretary of Defense Perry met the then Prime Minister of Israel, Shimon Peres. During the meeting, the U.S. made a commitment to assist Israel in the development of a THEL Advanced Concept Technology Demonstrator (ACTD) by the end of 1998. Congress gave more than $55 million for THEL development in 1997. Expense to the U.S. taxpayer and U.S. national security are apparently not considerations at the political level when sharing the results of U.S. weapons development programs with Israel. Nautilus was offered to Israel in the form of a multimillion-dollar "research grant."
The funding for Nautilus research was part of a $2 billion military grants package Clinton offered to Shimon Peres. Israel's access to real-time U.S. satellite imagery and at least $50 million for accelerated development of the "Nautilus" laser system were included in the Clinton package.
"Our commitment to Israel's security is unshakable and it will remain so because Israel must have the right to defend itself, by itself," President Bill Clinton, said as he explained why he was giving Israel an additional $200 million in U.S. taxpayer money above and beyond the $5.5 billion aid in U.S. grants and loan guarantees already given Israel in 1996. Described as the "the world's first high-energy laser weapon system," THEL-ACTD reportedly shot down a rocket with a live warhead on June 6, 2000 at the Army's High Energy Laser Systems Test Facility (HELSTF), White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. The THEL-ACTD is a highly mobile "stand-alone defensive weapon system" unlike the earlier version.
"Truly Revolutionary Weapon":
"We've just turned science fiction into reality," said Lt. Gen. John Costello, Commanding General, U.S. Army Space & Missile Defense Command.
"The THEL-ACTD shoot-down is a watershed event for a truly revolutionary weapon," said Tim Hannemann, executive vice president and general manager, TRW Space & Electronics Group.
During the test of THEL-ACTD, an armed Katyusha rocket was fired from a rocket launcher placed at a site in White Sands Missile Range. Seconds later, the THEL-ACTD, located several miles away, detected the launch with its fire control radar, tracked the streaking rocket with its high precision pointer tracker system, then engaged the rocket with its high-energy chemical laser. Within seconds, the 10-foot-long, 5-inch-diameter rocket exploded. In a series of two- rocket salvo tests conducted August 28 and September 22, 2000, in the rolling, high desert of the Army's White Sands Missile Range, N.M., the THEL/ACTD did twice what no other air defense system has ever been designed to do: detect, track, and destroy multiple Katyushas in a single engagement. This weaponry, which is usually described as defensive in the context of anti-missile applications, can be mounted on an airplane, ship, land-based station, or satellite. It can bombard its target with either beams that will destroy it outright, or by beams of lesser strength to disable the target's electronics and cause it to go out of control.
The physicist told AFP, "From my experience as a physicist and research scientist with the GRU (Russia's Central Intelligence Agency) I have enough experience to judge that the WTC towers have been burning too quickly, too hot, and too completely to have been caused by the kerosene [jet fuel] fires that resulted from the crashes. Furthermore, the demolished buildings nearby [the 47-story Salomon Bros. Bldg.] are an indication that there was a plasmoid cloud involved, which probably affected the buildings nearby."
A plasmoid cloud is a heated and ionized gas that can be created and projected using far infrared thermal waves. Plasma occurs when a gas is heated so that some electrons have been separated from their atoms or molecules. Ball lightning is considered by experts to be a plasmoid phenomenon.
The physicist told AFP that he believes that a plasmoid may have been projected onto the towers before the planes struck. "The planes may have had a plasmoid in front of them. Just two or three seconds before the planes hit the towers, a plasmoid on the towers would have caused the Faraday cabin effect, like a car being hit by lightning."
The Pentagon was less damaged by a similar plane crash and fire because either a plasmoid was not involved or as the physicist speculated, "the Pentagon is technically shielded and protected from plasmoids." "The thermal infrared plasmoid would have raised the heat of the building. One should examine the videos in slow motion to see exactly when the fires started. A plasmoid would have affected the computers in neighboring buildings, because the plasmoid affects computers and cannot be targeted precisely," the physicist said.
If that were the case, another plasma expert says, "it seems evident that if the object [the plane] is moving at high speed in the dense lower levels of the atmosphere, the sudden collapse of the force free field and plasmoid would result in its thermal disintegrati